Short answer

Ling 3.1 Flash and Claude Opus 5.5 have source-backed API records here. The search phrase astra 6.1 remains unconfirmed as an exact official model name. These pages document prices and reproducible checks, not completed inference benchmarks.

Which new model should I investigate first?

Choose by the job rather than the release date. A zero displayed token rate does not establish sufficient availability, JSON correctness or reliable tool use. A premium model does not guarantee that generated animation code will render or export. A useful decision records both a passing result and the cost of failed attempts.

What prices have actually been checked?

Model / channelInput / 1MOutput / 1MVerifiedEvidence
Ling 3.1 Flash / OpenRouter$0.00$0.002026-10-03Source
Claude Opus 5.5 / Anthropic$4.00$20.002026-10-03Source

All token rates use USD per million tokens. Ling first-party hosted rates are pending and are not filled with the OpenRouter number. Consult each model record for cache-read prices and channel verification dates. The date of this article is not a claim that every previously tracked model was rechecked.

Use the workload calculator with the exact route you intend to use. Count retries, prompt revisions and outputs that you discard. Account funding, tools, rendering and storage can create costs beyond the displayed text-token subtotal.

How should I read price changes?

The price-history ledger keeps observations by model and channel. Both newly added models start with baselines; no past rate is reconstructed. A new version and an older version can have different list rates without creating a change event for either model.

For an apples-to-apples estimate, hold input, output and cache-hit share fixed. Then compare versions or channels. Do not treat a supplier's typical-workload percentage as a guaranteed reduction for your workload. Cache-write charges and special processing modes also need their own budget lines.

What does astra 6.1 refer to?

As of 2026-10-03, our official-source check did not establish an exact model ID for astra 6.1. OpenAI documents GPT-6 Astra and GPT-6.1 Sol separately. This note preserves the search question without substituting one model or price for another.

Before integration, resolve the exact identifier from the provider's API catalog. Keep this unresolved phrase out of calculator options and price history. If a matching official product is later confirmed, its record can begin with a sourced baseline rather than guessed historical prices.

Which trends do not belong in a text-model price table?

Raindance AI trend is not established here as a specific text-model API. It needs a confirmed product, endpoint, billing unit and access terms before comparison. Video templates and generators may bill by seconds, credits or jobs instead of text tokens. Likewise, generic text-to-video, voice-changing and downloader searches are different intents, not reasons to add invented LLM records.

Our scope remains model identity, API access, route-specific token costs and repeatable workload checks. Keep the original request, response and measurement context when reporting a test. The guides below provide starting requests, but no speed, accuracy or successful-video claim has been measured by this site.

New model questions

Are these API benchmarks?

No. Public documentation and price metadata were checked; authenticated inference was not run. Every test checklist explicitly identifies missing results.

Is astra 6.1 the same as GPT-6.1 Sol?

Do not assume that. Official pages separately identify GPT-6 Astra and GPT-6.1 Sol; this site has not confirmed an exact astra 6.1 model ID.

Does a new model have a recorded price reduction?

Only if its own channel history contains a verified change. A first observation is a baseline, and a different model version is not a historical price change.